Several student employees in the IT services department have had their hours reinstated following what has been characterized as a “miscommunication,” according to Vice President of the Division of Information Technology Monique Sendze and Director of ITSS Amandeep Grewal. Some student employees were informed in individual meetings with their supervisor on Tuesday that any shifts beyond the next day were being cancelled and their employment would be terminated as of then, according to three student employees who were affected. These students spoke to The Orion on the condition of anonymity out of fear of negative repercussions.
“Supervisors have since connected individually with seven of the eight affected students to clarify options and confirm their schedules for the remainder of the semester, and we are working to connect with the last student as quickly as we can,” Sendze said in an email to The Orion.
The Orion received a tip Tuesday morning that multiple student employees in the IT department had their hours cut without previous warning. After reaching out to students, three of the affected employees expressed, on condition of anonymity, that their shifts had been cancelled and their employment effectively terminated.
When The Orion sought confirmation and clarity, Interim Chief of Staff Ashley Gebb, along with officials in DoIT, said no hours were cut.
In the aftermath, Sendze expressed that there was a miscommunication and that this was part of ITSS standard operating procedure at the end of each semester. The three student employees that The Orion spoke with all expressed that they had not experienced anything resembling that standard procedure during multiple years of employment.
In an email sent out Tuesday at 2:35 p.m. by Grewal to the ITSS student staff, Grewal clarified that DoIT is reviewing its budget and staffing needs for the remainder of the academic year, however “ … there is no immediate need to reduce student employee hours.”
In an email to The Orion on Wednesday, Sendze shared “… once we became aware that some students had concerns about their work hours, we acted quickly to understand the situation and ensure that every student in good standing who wants to continue working is supported in doing so.”
Despite repeated questions to DoIT officials, they have yet to confirm whether the student supervisor, Kelli Trnka, effectively terminated the employment of multiple students – The Orion was provided direct evidence supporting student assertions that this occurred.
It is still unclear how a miscommunication within the department led to the understanding among the student employees that their employment was being terminated. The Orion asked multiple times for clarification regarding this characterization, and it has not received a direct answer.
One source expressed doubt that the meetings were a result of miscommunication and instead suggested that the department chose to walk back a deliberate decision based on the negative feedback received.
Despite repeated questions to DoIT officials, they have neglected to elaborate on how they will prevent miscommunications such as this from happening in the future.
In an email to The Orion Sendze said “… out of respect for both the students and employees involved, I won’t be sharing further details. We’ve addressed the miscommunication and consider the matter resolved.”
Chris Hutton and Sean Shanks can be reached at [email protected]
John Doe // May 2, 2025 at 11:14 am
Academic Senate Meeting April 24th, 2025:
At 59:30, DoIT VP talks about their cost cutting measures in relation to student hours.
I’d definitely recommend people watch it to better form their opinions. Its only about 4 mins for the relevant section.
I think it shows the mentality upper management had before this hit the fan. If it really is a “miscommunication,” then they are incompetent at best.
Alvin Duenas // May 2, 2025 at 2:11 pm
From the Senate meeting transcript. Doesn’t seem like a miscommunication at all. Slick phrasing to say we will hire those with work study, but not promise retaining current levels….
VP:
And for this year, we have actually come up with a budget reduction of 1.5 million, a little over $1.5 million.
As a total budget reduction. And the way that we and we have achieved that over $1.5 million in reduction through a combination of personal attrition.
Elimination of products. As well as organizational restructuring.
In staffing reductions alone. We have realized the $1.1 million in reductions.
Which is from seven full-time positions that we’ve had to eliminate through attrition.
We’ve also had to reduce our student assistant hours by over $100,000, which comes to about 6,000 hours of student labor that we’ve had to reduce.
AARON:
Yeah, I’m curious if you could help me understand if I heard correctly, over $100,000 of that savings is by cutting 6,000 hours worth of student employment.
I’m hoping you can help me understand what led to that decision to cut that money from the student employment?
Is there anywhere else that those cuts can be made to actually maintain those student working hours but still have the same effect and ultimately furthermore $100,000 in the grand scheme of our deficit is not even 1%. And I’m just curious why it is that we’re cutting those student positions for such little savings.
VP:
So what we’re doing is moving more to work study hours as opposed to having this funded through the general fund.
AARON:
So are we still going to offer 6,000 hours worth of work study hours?
VP:
That is correct. We even are offering more. We have more allocation given to us for work study hours than we have in the general fund.
So we did that and actually shifted to paying for our student workers with work study with money instead.
AARON:
So the real effect to students will be that their jobs will be maintained, just getting paid out of a different pot, correct?
VP:
I can’t say that those hours are maintained hour for hour.
But we are shifting to hiring more of our students with work study money.
Pedal Pusher Peggy // May 2, 2025 at 3:40 pm
You left this out: In addition, five open positions for the division were not filled. Keep all the facts out there.
A // May 2, 2025 at 4:15 pm
The part that wasn’t said: Not all students qualify for work study. If there are current student employees who don’t qualify for work study, they cannot be paid from that pool. On top of that, there is a finite number of work study hours a student can work. Are they planning on letting go of current student employees who don’t qualify for work study? Will students be unable to work if they run out of work study hours before the next semester?
Pedal Pusher Peggy // May 2, 2025 at 3:12 pm
Cool story, John Doe. Just missed the bit where VP Monique Sendze clarified cuts included staff positions. But hey, why let details ruin a good narrative tilt?
Jazzy Juno // May 2, 2025 at 10:16 am
@Pedal Pusher Peggy, wya girl?? Here’s your follow-up article with admin essentially confirming the other story.
XOXO – Juno
Pedal Pusher Peggy // May 2, 2025 at 10:50 am
Hey Jazzy have no fear….Peggy is here! Let’s be honest Peggy is THE ONLY REASON this paper is getting views. I got ya girl Lexi in my DM’s trying to get a meet and greet. Now….that will be REAL NEWS.