The Orion

Pathways put student priorities in peril

Matt Murphy

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






mattMurphycolor.jpg

Matt Murphy


The ideology that general education is built on is solid: a well-rounded
education creates well-rounded individuals who will become well-rounded
members of society.

This is why everyone has to take a history class.

But that wasn’t enough for the administrators of the California State University system.

The general education pathways were instituted two years ago with the intent of giving students a more in-depth look at a specific subject area.

These pathways have become heavily impacted as students are bottlenecked into the upper-division portions of the 10 pathways. For instance, in my pathway, Health and Wellness, there are only nine classes to choose from to fulfill three sections.

Health and Wellness is one of the most popular pathways.
Students sat on the floor for weeks at the beginning of the semester in
my “Introduction to Exercise Nutrition” class.

I understand the benefits of the pathways. Theoretically, students that begin them in
their first year become well-versed in a specific area and maybe
develop a strong enough interest to transition into a minor.

The point of the general education program shouldn’t be to force students into a minor. It should be to introduce them to a broad spectrum of classes that will pique an interest that can be parlayed into a major.

I would argue that most students find subjects they’re interested in during those introductory classes and don’t need the extra prodding of the pathways.

But by the time they’re upper-classmen, students are left having to satisfy requirements that are unnecessary and detrimental to their academic progress. Seniors are not able to get spots in impacted classes.

When the pathways were implemented, for students who had already completed the first tier of general education, the process of crossing over was so confusing that I’ve never been onboard with the idea.

These past two years with the upper-division pathways should be considered a trial period that hasn’t worked.

Students shouldn’t have to suffer from an ill-conceived system that ultimately keeps them in school longer.

General education is an essential part of the overall college curriculum. The more general it can stay, the better.

Higher education is about making your own choices. Academic interests should not being forced upon students.

Matt Murphy can be reached at [email protected] or @matthewcharlesz on Twitter.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • Pathways put student priorities in peril

    Columns

    Sushi burritos: Delicious or disgusting?

  • Pathways put student priorities in peril

    Blogs

    Porn is more than just Playboy magazines

  • Pathways put student priorities in peril

    Blogs

    Seven reasons why your friend might be the real snake

  • Pathways put student priorities in peril

    Columns

    Sex workers deserve to be treated like human beings

  • Pathways put student priorities in peril

    Blogs

    Off the Record: sex workers and sensitive language

  • Pathways put student priorities in peril

    Blogs

    Our future is dependent on informed voting

  • Pathways put student priorities in peril

    Blogs

    Nike, a force to be reckoned with

  • Pathways put student priorities in peril

    Blogs

    DTF with protection?

  • Pathways put student priorities in peril

    Blogs

    Slip ‘n’ slide safely around the bedroom

  • Pathways put student priorities in peril

    Columns

    Renters insurance: why we need what we hate

Navigate Right
X
The student news site of California State University, Chico
Pathways put student priorities in peril