The Orion

#MarchforScience still had its problems

Roberto Fonseca

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






The March for Science did a great job in showcasing the importance of current scientific issues and triumphs to Americans, but there were still some problems.

Conversations about climate change are what dominated the events. It was fantastic to see such support towards a cause nationwide.

There is more than enough scientific evidence to prove that climate change is man-made and that investing in renewable energy is the best way to move forward. The science march brought these issues to light and helped spread awareness to people who might still be trying to disprove climate change.

Chico State held a great event where individuals could interact with booths and promote scientific endeavors.

The problem with the entire event is that there are still very big political overtones. Anti-Trump ideology, intersectionality, gender identity and anti-racism were some of the other topics at hand during the march.

These aren’t problematic topics, but there has to be a time and place for everything along with facts to back up claims that the organizers of the march made.

There is nothing wrong with promoting diversity in STEM fields. There is always a need for scientists and mathematicians, but to make claims that the lack of diversity in such fields is because of racist and sexist structural systems are simply not true.

People of color are over-represented in majors that provide less income. These are personal decisions made at the time of entering college. There will possibly never be true equity in a STEM field as long as white people dominate the population of the United States.

Hispanics and African Americans make up 29 percent of the population of the United States. Being a minority along with the fact that the two groups choose to major in non-STEM fields are the main reasons why there is inequality in STEM fields.

Women aren’t in the minority, but women make different choices in life. Women tend to pursue nursing, psychology and business administration degrees, whereas men pursue business administration, finance, and biology degrees.

The march didn’t only attempt to exhibit the perceived social barriers of the STEM fields but also had strong anti-Trump tones. The only reason that this is problematic is because it wasn’t the point of the demonstration.

It’s great that people are beginning to become activists, but tying Trump into every movement is unnecessary. Trump has repeatedly denounced climate change as a hoax, but should not have been the center of the event.

This event shouldn’t have gone against Trump, instead, it should have given the due diligence that science deserves. People need to be aware of the changes that are going on, and not focus on the lies of social barriers within the STEM fields.

If people are going to talk about science, there needs to be factual honesty. Marches like this should be done in true support of their cause, not as a political message or as a way to talk about fake societal issues.

Roberto Fonseca can be reached at [email protected] or @rjfonseca13 on twitter.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1 Comment

One Response to “#MarchforScience still had its problems”

  1. Mark Stemen on May 3rd, 2017 7:23 am

    Robert, please be honest. If you are going to cite an study the points out that “people of color are over represented in majors that provide less income” you should show the integrity of quoting their reasoning not make up your own. You claim it is simply a “choice” where the article points out “There is no singular reason for the racial disparities within majors, but centuries of racial discrimination, uneven budgetary support for K-12 education and poor academic advising and student support contribute to the problem.”

    [Reply]

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • #MarchforScience still had its problems

    Blogs

    Sugaring can be both sweet and sour

  • #MarchforScience still had its problems

    Blogs

    Self-care is important; stress free phone apps

  • #MarchforScience still had its problems

    Blogs

    A ‘lovebite’ is an affectionate sign of love, embrace it

  • #MarchforScience still had its problems

    Blogs

    Wildcat on the Street: Parking

  • #MarchforScience still had its problems

    Blogs

    Better ways to cope with a ‘hellish’ schedule

  • #MarchforScience still had its problems

    Columns

    Selfies are self-confidence boosters

  • Blogs

    Podcast: Kegels, being a vegan student and having pets in college

  • #MarchforScience still had its problems

    Blogs

    The friend zone: myth or fact?

  • #MarchforScience still had its problems

    Columns

    Kegels are the next best thing to better sex

  • #MarchforScience still had its problems

    Blogs

    How to live the life of luxury as a college student

X
The student news site of California State University, Chico
#MarchforScience still had its problems